| |
Prophet Mohammad said: "Women are the other half
of men." The unit of humanity is not a man or a woman. It is a man
and a woman in that unison that makes them a family (just like the
smallest part of water is not oxygen or hydrogen but both united). Like
Judaism and Christianity and many other religions, Islam decrees that the
pairing off of a man and a woman to make a family constitutes a sacred
bond that the Quran calls "a stout pledge", that has to be
documented and authenticated by the "marriage contract" or
wed-lock. It signifies the commitment of the spouses to one another and
establishes their mutual rights and responsibilities as well as those vis
a vis their children.
Children have the right to legitimacy (birth under a
marriage contract and having and knowing their father and mother), loving
care as they are raised, being nurtured and catered for both physically
and spiritually, and the right of education and getting them equipped to
face life and bear its responsibilities as mature and useful citizens. As
the parents attain old age or get incapacitated some way or another, it is
the children's religious duty to look after them and cater to their
comfort without feeling impatient or distressed about it. It is a right
towards God. Of course it is the perpetual insurance for the future of the
children as they themselves grow up and become parents and attain old age.
This solidarity of the family and strength of the
family ties is of paramount importance in Islam. It spreads even beyond
the nuclear family along the widening circles of blood ties. The Quran
calls it "the relation of the womb". It is both a duty and a
rewardable charity to be kind to those blood kindred through friendly care
or financial support if needed. Even after parents have died, it remains
one's duty to pray for them, and even to maintain the ties with their
friends, show them courtesy, and offer help if needed.
In Islam, marriage subserves two functions, and it is
only marriage that lawfully subserves them. The one is to fulfil the
yearning of the one half to its other half and their becoming one, both
physically and spiritually. "Amongst His signs is that He created for
you -from amongst you- consorts, with whom to dwell in tranquility; and He
laid love and compassion between you." (30:21) The other function is
to procreate and have a progeny; "God made for you -from amongst you-
consorts, and out of your consorts made for you children and
grandchildren; and bestowed on you from His bounty; would they then
believe in the vain things and deny the blessings of God?" (16:72)
Marriage is the only legitimate venue for sex and reproduction.
Trespassing outside marriage is a grave sin, and it can also be a legal
offense in Islam if witnessed by four witnesses who identify the
perpetrators and testify to have seen a complete sexual act. To satisfy
these legal criteria must be a very rare event, and it seems it was meant
to be so.
It is noteworthly that the same moral principles used
to prevail also in America and the West, but with the slippage of more and
more people into atheism or microtheism, change was inevitable. Atheism is
when God is denied. Microtheism is when God is acknowledged but with
reduced Godliness. We worship Him but on our own terms. We visit the
houses of worship usually on weekends, but we do not allow God out to tell
us what to do with our private or public lives. This erosion of faith set
the stage for the "sexual revolution", as all religious values
became subject to radical revision. The sexual revolution did not start as
recently as we think in the sixties. Nor was it the outcome of a passive
natural social change. It was the result of intelligent planning, hard
work and perseverance. It all started with the extreme fascination with
science and its technological capabilities, in the wake of banishment of
the church from delving into public life. The human mind became the
Ultimate arbiter of all human affairs, and all time-honored values were
subjected to its new rulings. In their haste and superficiality, however,
people missed the obvious fact that the human mind itself, and by its own
admission, is an imperfect instrument, and that with its limitation it
cannot pass such ultimate judgments as those concerning the absolute moral
standards. The mere fact that the mind diligently seeks more knowledge and
pursues further research is a confession that there is so much it remains
ignorant about. Had the human mind thought it was complete, then it would
have ceased its pursuits and spared the research budgets; but the case is
as the Quran describes it, "Of knowledge, it is only a little that
was communicated to you." (17:85)
To further replace God by man, a movement arose
between the two world wars called "Morality without Religion",
accusing religion -and not human error- of causing enmity and conflict
between people. They pretended the same moralities could be attained
without necessarily ascribing them to religion and called them
"unattached moralities". But as religion moved out of focus God
was dethroned, and new codes of morality were issued wherein the
immoralities of yesterday became the normalities of today, and secular
humanism could at last frankly declare that human values must be made by
human beings and without relevance to any non-human or supernatural
reference. With the shift towards materialism such values as honor,
chastity and purity became empty words and nonviable currency. A full
range of indoctrination worked to stretch the boundaries of freedom to
include license, and in a society that emphasizes individuality, every
human whim became a human right.
It was another setback when the tidal wave that hit
society deluged also many of the traditional custodians of religion and
protectors of its values - the clergy. These were the Trojan horse,
because instead of leaving the religious camp to the libertarian camp,
they started working on religion itself by new re-interpretations and new
exegesis of the texts to render lawful and permissible what has been
unlawful and reprehensive along the whole history of those religions. Many
of those clergy themselves fell prey to the germs they were supposed to
fend off. Some even interpreted the institution of "celibacy" as
refraining from marriage but not from having sex, as we read in News Week
some time ago.
The result, as expected, is this chaotic sexual
conduct of whole societies. Without the values of chastity outside
marriage and fidelity within it, came the desecration of sex as a very
special bond between a man and a woman, mass and promiscuous sex, spur
posses, rapes, unwanted pregnancies ending in abortion or unwanted
children stripped of their right of legitimate double parentage, and
children begetting children. Further, family trust is eroded when even in stable families
some 15 percent of the children are not their fathers', added to all this
are health hazards due to the epidemic spread of sexually transmitted
diseases, whether new diseases or the recurrence of old ones we thought
have been conquered long ago. Their causative organisms have acquired
resistance to known antibiotic therapy, and with rising promiscuity they
are exacting a heavy toll on the community, especially the youth.
We Muslims do not have any confusion or vagueness
about what is lawful in our religion and what is unlawful. The Quran
remains in the original text that was revealed, word to word and letter to
letter. The Quran is the divine words: and any translation or rendition in
any language including Arabic (the Quranic language) cannot be called
Quran. The moralities and the immoralities specified in the Quran will
remain so forever, and cannot be diluted or manipulated or rationalized.
There are no clergy, or scholars who can claim to be endowed with the
right or ability of special interpretation. This does not mean that all
Muslims are therefore virtuous people who do not sin. Of course, Muslims
violate their own religion by committing sins and abominations, but at
least they know it is sin, and it will remain on their conscience until
they desist and repent to God. The real challenge, however, faces Muslims
who are citizens of Western communities where the children are raised
under social and moral norms that conflict with the teachings of Islam.
Muslims are not alone in this, because there are also Jews, Christians and
others who uphold the same divine moralities and make every effort to
endow their children with them. Cooperation is already in progress and
more is encouraged between Muslims and those who believe similarly, be
they clergy or lay individuals or associations.
Our way with our children follows an early
introduction to God (see Chapter One), and that when we believe in
Him it means we accept and abide by His rules. If we follow His rules we
do not bother if the others do not, for when one is on the side of God
then one is in the majority. This breeds the confidence that resists peer
pressure and the vagaries of temptation. "They all do it" ceases
to be an excuse. The vaccination approach aims at building up immunity
long before the child is exposed to disease: be it physical or moral. Just
like a soldier is prepared to battle before and not during the battle,
future hazards and catches are discussed with the child so that he/she
would decide in advance what position to take when the time comes whether
the offer is smoking, drink, drug or sex. Fortunately, the preaching of
premarital chastity entails more than an order to obey (of course the
teaching is that when God orders, we hear and we obey). Discussions with
Muslim and non-Muslim youth presented the case equally powerfully even
along purely intellectual lines. "Who believes in equality of the
sexes?", and it is a unanimous vote. "Who believes in
justice?", and again it is a unanimous agreement. The proposition is
then introduced that any relationship between two partners, the
consequences of which are not equally shared by both, cannot constitute
justice; and they all agree. In a situation of liberal sex, the
consequences are not equally shared, because the female side is the loser
all the way, whether she is deserted, or gets pregnant and goes for
abortion, or gives birth and signs away her baby for adoption or ends with
a fatherless baby to support alone for the rest of her life. When we
observe the consequences and ask the question, "Can this be
justice?" the general shout is "No!".
The homosexuality movement was a fairly latecomer on
the wagon of the sexual revolution. Homosexuality, of course, is not a new
invention as it has always been there in practically all cultures and
among all people but, one would guess, in more limited proportions. It had
its lobby whose activities followed more or less subtle ways, but its
influence mushroomed only over the past decade or so. I do remember
academic conferences where some scientific papers were given, upon
rigorous scientific methodology, to prove by scientific experiment the
safety of anal sex. That was in the early seventies, and to me the
findings were so contradicting to simple common sense that I began, for
the first time in my academic life, to doubt the honesty of some
scientific researchers. Shortly thereafter, the American Psychiatric
Association declared that homosexuality was no more to be considered
an illness to be treated but merely an orientation or a sexual variant.
The rest is history. A "Gay Bowel Syndrome" was described in the
medical literature, and later it was AIDS that made the news and its
relation to homosexual behavior being established. Very soon the AIDS
problem was pushed out of the medical arena and its rules and regulations
for handling infectious diseases. It became a political issue, and the
homosexual lobby further grew into a political power capable of
intimidating office bearers and political figures and gaining the support
of many in the media, the arts and the clergy. Instead of AIDS being
contained it spilled over to blood recipients, drug addicts, the fetus in
utero, heterosexual contacts with wives and others and accidental
infections. It became a global epidemic that is spreading at a serious
pace. To the AIDS patient we have empathy and compassion and hopefully the
best available medical and nursing care. To those not infected we
recommend the preventive approach. This is not the condom, for there is no
such a thing as safe sex. It is chastity until marriage, and fidelity
within marriage. The debate about homosexuality is ravaging. "Be what
you are" they say, "and do not be ashamed of it". Many
unsuspecting youth started to experiment, to discover what they really
are. Consent is a requisite, and the lobbies in Scandinavia are trying to
bring down the consent age to four years. A 'Gay Pride Day' is annually
observed in California with media coverage, a 'Gay Pride Month' in some
school districts has been established to remove bigotry and prejudice, and
two-man or two-woman households are being presented as alternative forms
of family. Recently, science began exploring a possible anatomical or
genetic basis for homosexual orientation.
We Muslims are not impressed, and to us the matter is
that simple. We do not make our religion, but we receive it and we obey
it. We cannot impose anything on anyone, but to us the Quran and the
teachings of prophet Mohammad clearly and explicitly condemn homosexual
practices. Whether you have the orientation or not, whether you harbor the
gene or not, your feelings and desires shall not dictate your behavior.
You might be dying to do something (be it homosexual contact or
heterosexual with a partner who is not your wife or taking an alcoholic
drink or an urge for a violent action or a desire to steal something that
is not yours), what you feel need not be what you do. "It is not for
a believing man or woman if a matter has been decided by God and His
messenger, to have a choice of their own. If anyone disobeys God and His
messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path." (33:36). Every
human being has an undisputed gene without which they cannot be a human
being: it is called the "gene of self-control"!
SOURCE: WWW. ISLAMFORUM.ORG
© 1996 -
UPDATED 8/23/99
** Courtesy of Islamic Center of Southern California |
|